| 
Roughly
 forty films left to go on my 2014 movie "To Watch" list.  I've had to 
prune back the selection significantly due to my reduced availability, 
and because I'm shooting for October as the deadline to put together a 
final Top Ten list.  As a result, a lot of the films I would have 
watched in previous years are being left by the wayside.  Which titles 
are being chucked from the list? 
Lots of little 
indie sci-fi films.  I love this genre and all the great work I've seen 
in recent years, but I just can't sift through every single promising 
title anymore.  So "Automata," "In Your Eyes," "Young Ones," and "The 
Signal" are being left out, along with Brit Marling and Mike Cahill's 
latest, "I Origins."  I've pointedly tried to support Marling in the 
past because I admire her aims if not her actual work, but after 
watching the "I Origins" trailer, my patience finally gave out.  Instead
 I watched "Coherence" and "Predestination" and "The Rover" and "Under 
the Skin," which were all getting much more positive attention.  Yeah, I
 hate having to depend on buzz as a measure here, but it's proven to be a
 pretty good yardstick so far. 
Another big chunk 
of titles fall into the indie drama category.  Lynn Shelton's 
"Laggies,"Joe Swanberg's "Happy Christmas," and Zach Braff's "Wish I Was
 Here" have gotten the boot.  These are the ones I feel the most badly 
about because these are the films that I'm not inclined to watch in the 
first place, and always have to prod myself to check out.  And as a 
result, I tend to find more surprises here.  Indie dramas are very 
hit-or-miss with me, but when one connects, it really connects.  2007's 
"Once" was one of these, so I made the effort to see John Carney's new 
film "Begin Again."  I did not like it, and I'm sorry to say it and "The
 Skeleton Twins" probably biased me against trying any of the others 
that I was on the fence about.   
I'm pretty weak 
when it comes to Oscar bait, but this year I had to draw the line at 
"Cake," which was widely accused of only existing to be a vehicle for 
Jennifer Aniston to snag an Oscar nomination, not that there's anything 
wrong with that.  In previous years I would have wanted to decide for 
myself, but this year I had my hands full just trying to keep up with 
the performances that were nominated like Julianne Moore in "Begin 
Again" and Reese Witherspoon in "Wild."  Also, apologies to Chadwick 
Boseman for skipping "Get On Up."  Other prestige pics I probably would 
have watched based on the talent involved include Jason Reitman's "Men 
Women & Children," Rupert Wyatt's "The Gambler," Susanne Bier's 
"Serena," and Thomas McCarthy's "The Cobbler" - even though the critical
 consensus says they're not worth it. 
The biggest 
category of 2014 films I would have watched, though, are the ones that 
never made it on to the list in the first place, all the weird little 
documentaries and all the foreign obscurities and the odd titles that 
pop up on Netflix or Amazon Instant.  This year I simply didn't go 
looking for more movies to watch outside a few major channels, so if a 
movie was significantly under the radar I probably never even heard 
about it.  This includes mainstream releases.  There was a Helen Mirren 
foodie film, for instance, called "The Hundred Foot Journey," that 
apparently came out last August but I didn't hear a peep about until a 
few weeks ago.  I've cut back on blockbusters in general, even benching 
good dumb fun like the "300" sequel and the Rock's "Hercules."   
However, I did watch both parts of Lars Von Trier's "Nymphomaniac," despite massive reservations.  It wasn't bad.   
--- | 
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
An Adjustment of Expectations (and the To Watch List)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment