"Heartburn" and "Postcards Form the Edge"

I tracked down the two later Mike Nichols films that he made with Meryl Streep, both based on the memoirs of famous women who wrote for the movies.  One is "Heartburn," a loosely fictionalized account of Nora Ephron's marriage to Carl Bernstein, and the very public subsequent divorce.  The other is "Postcards From the Edge," a loosely fictionalized account of Carrie Fisher's recovery from drug addiction and her relationship with her mother, Debbie Reynolds.  "Postcards" got much better reviews when it was initially released, but I liked "Heartburn" better. 

I don't necessarily think that "Heartburn" is the better film, but it's far more to my tastes.  Rachel (Streep) is a divorcee who falls for Mark (Jack Nicholson), also divorced, but has strong misgivings about marrying him.  Nonetheless, she goes all in on a new life together, navigating housing woes and motherhood, before infidelity throws a wrench in the works.  Streep's performance here is from that early part of her career when she was able to just disappear into the characters she played without a trace.  I found it so easy to empathize with her, and share the ups and downs of the relationship.  And a big strength of "Heartburn" is that the highs are as strong as the lows.  When the marriage is good, it's good.  Nicholson is terribly charming, and there are scenes of bonding and intimacy that are truly heartwarming and uplifting, while also being very ordinary in the best way.  It also helps that Ephron wrote the script, and I've loved her writing for decades.   

"Postcards From the Edge," written by Carrie Fisher, features a Meryl Streep that I instantly recognized as the Meryl Streep who has been a movie star for the last thirty-odd years.  She plays Suzanne Vale, an actress and the daughter of screen legend Doris Mann (Shirley MacLaine).  We start with Suzanne at a low point, ODing during a film shoot, and being sent to rehab.  After checking out, she discovers that the only way she'll be allowed to work again is if she moves back in with her mother, who she finds overbearing and impossible.  Also involved are a new love interest (Dennis Quaid), a fed-up director (Gene Hackman), and a very nice doctor (Richard Dreyfuss).  There are some excellent individual scenes, and just about everything involving Streep and MacLaine sings (sometimes literally).  However, the struggles with addiction and the jabs at the fakery of Hollywood didn't do much for me.  I have a history of being less interested in movies about actors, though this one was perfectly fine.  I just never got as invested as I did with "Heartburn."

The two films are so different in subject matter and tone that comparing them feels ungenerous.  "Postcards From the Edge" was made four years after "Heartburn," when Streep was deliberately moving into more commercial fare.  Though both ensemble casts feature a lot of well-known actors, "Postcards" is more self-consciously star-studded, and is very much a Hollywood story.  The comedy is broader and the melodrama more theatrical, though there are a few wry moments of honesty too.  "Heartburn," though it's about a pair of famous writers, feels like it could be about any couple trying to navigate a bad   marriage.  There are some nods toward the East Coast milieu where Ephron was based in the late '70s, but most of the narrative keeps the focus on Rachel and Mark's fairly mundane day-to-day lives.  Rachel's writing is used as a framing device, but has little to do with the plot, while Suzanne's career struggles are central to her movie.   

And in the end I'm very glad that I saw both.  Both movies offered a wealth of surprises, from Annette Bening's brief but winning appearance as a rival actress in "Postcards From the Edge," to Jack Nicholson breaking out the showtunes in "Heartburn."  It's been so long since I've seen a good Jack Nicholson movie.  And it's been a few years since we lost Carrie Fisher, Nora Ephron, and Mike Nichols, and I miss them all.        

---

Deep In "The Drama"

To understand what kind of film "The Drama" is, and whether you're likely or not to enjoy it, you've got to ignore the stars for a minute.  We'll get back to them soon, I promise.  Right now, let's note that the film was written and directed by Kristoffer Borgli, a Norwegian filmmaker whose one previous English language film was "Dream Scenario" with Nicholas Cage.  It was an A24 film that got good reviews, but almost no mainstream attention.  Borgli's American films have been produced by Ari Aster, and they have the same sort of bleak, pitch-black comedic tone as Aster's films like "Eddington" and "Beau is Afraid."  Borgli's films aren't as nihilistic or anxiety-inducing, fortunately, but I still found "Dream Scenario" a tough watch because the main character was so alienating, the story was a downer, and the worldbuilding felt a little off.  Fortunately, "The Drama" manages to move away from this, to its benefit. 

Firstly, "The Drama" is working off of a much more audience-friendly premise, with a cast of charismatic young actors.  Emma (Zendaya) and Charlie (Robert Pattinson) are a young couple in love and deep in the process of wedding planning.  One night, when they're out with their married friends Rachel (Alana Haim) and Mike (Mamadou Athie), they all have too much to drink and confess to the worst things that they've ever done.  Emma's confession is so unexpected and disturbing that Charlie starts rethinking their whole relationship.  The reaction of their friends also prompts soul-searching and paranoia on Emma's part, and she's determined to keep the damage of the revelation from spreading.  I'm not going to spoil what the revelation is or the various twists and turns that happen as a result, but I caution that the characters are often difficult, and the anxiety ramps up to uncomfortable levels at times.  Borgli's filmmaking approach is still pretty astringent.  The character reactions and dynamics occasionally feel off, possibly because Borgli's a European filmmaker making a movie about mostly American characters, and doesn't quite seem to grasp how Americans deal with this kind of controversial subject matter.  It's similar to how Luca Guadagnino's take on sexual harassment in "After the Hunt" didn't quite ring true, with the whole situation coming off as very contrived.  

Fortunately, Borgli does manage to get the tone of the picture right, and the actors make up for any weaknesses in the writing with their performances.  Zendaya and Robert Pattinson are both very good, share reasonable amounts of screen chemistry together as a couple, and manage to make all the conflicting aspects of their characters make sense onscreen.  Zendaya has the tougher part as Emma, who we also see as a teenager played by Jordyn Curet.  This is supposed to be somebody who has been hiding a deep, dark, awful part of herself for years, whose little idiosyncrasies could be totally innocent, but maybe they aren't so innocent.  Zendaya's screen persona is perfect for this, as she's frequently playing unimpressed girlfriends and love interests who are a little smarter and a little cooler than the heroes trying to keep up with her, behavior that can read as abrasive with a few adjustments.  Pattinson is in everyman mode, endearingly ruffled during the meet-cute scenes, and using what appears to be his real accent.  His job is to let his suspicions get the better of him and spiral in a believable, entertaining way, and spiral he does. 

And what's more, the humor worked for me.  It helps to keep in mind that every single one of the characters are being absolute hypocrites about the behavior they do and don't find acceptable.  The film isn't making light of the terrible things that are discussed, but targeting the attitudes and the assumptions of the people involved.  I also love the portrayal of the absolute hell of trying to put together a big wedding, with wonderfully awkward encounters with a photographer played by Zoe Winters, and DJs played by Sydney Lemmons and Jeremy Levick.  Borgli's also not treading in territory that's nearly as dark or as nihilistic as I was expecting.  Yes, bad things happen to Emma and Charlie, but they're kept at a reasonable scale.  There's always the threat that something really outrageous and life-ruining is going to occur, but all the events of "The Drama" turn out to be something that you could reasonably see happening in real life.  

Because this isn't a horror or thriller film, and the comedy is not very broad.  "The Drama" is what it says on the poster - a pretty solid dramedy.  And that's rarer these days on the silver screen than it should be.   

---

And What Didn't Make My Top Ten Episodes of 2025-2026

Boy, there was a lot of television this year.  I have a list of honorable mentions that's the same length as my actual Top Ten list, which isn't something that's happened before.  Like last year, I want to focus on the more notable shows and episodes I watched instead of trying to be comprehensive. 

Let's start with the big finales - "Stranger Things" and "The Boys," which got the most press.  There was an outsized amount of wailing and carrying on from certain parts of their fanbases, who felt let down that the big finales didn't live up to their expectations.  Frankly, my expectations for both shows were never that high, given the nature of the programs, and I found both endings reasonably enjoyable.  "The Boys" finale was probably the best episode of its season, with Homelander finally getting what was coming to him.   Apologies to "The Righteous Gemstones,""Hacks," "Outlander," and "Euphoria," but these were never in my rotation, and I'll have to catch up on them at a later time.

Some buzzed-about new shows that didn't make the list include "Knight of the Seven Kingdoms," which is a much smaller scale "Game of Thrones" spinoff with an excellent cast.  However, the limited scale and lower stakes means that it hasn't really had the opportunity to hit the dramatic highs of the other Westeros shows.  It's very charming, but I'm waiting to see what it will grow into.  "Alien: Earth" got some love, especially for its episode that homages the original "Alien," but I liked watching the hybrids and the recovered aliens week-to-week a lot better.  There's a ton of potential here that I hope "Alien: Earth" gets a chance to build on.  "Spider-Noir" is a weird curiosity that I'm glad got made, and it works better than I ever would have expected.  "Wonder Man" was a fun break from the MCU norm, but not really my thing.  Also, "Ironheart," "Smoke," "Margo's Got Money Troubles," and "Starfleet Academy" were uneven and got mixed responses, but I enjoyed them all..

Lots of returning shows had good seasons, but most didn't quite have the highs they had in the past, including "Slow Horses," "The Pitt," "Invincible,"  "Foundation," "The Artful Dodger," "The Diplomat," "Only Murders in the Building," and "The Night Manager."  As a former '90s kid, I also enjoyed the nostalgic returns of "King of the Hill" and "South Park" after long hiatuses, and the newest season of "Futurama."  "Gary," the surprise prequel episode to "The Bear" from this spring got more attention than the previous season from the summer of 2025.  "Gary" was fine, but I preferred the season finale episode "Goodbye."  I think the return of "Beef" also belongs in this category, even though the show is an anthology.   "Oh the Comfort, the Inexpressible Comfort" was my favorite installment, a sort-of evil mirror universe version of an episode of "The Pitt."

Two of the episodes that came closest to making the list were released at the tail end of May - the finale of the second season of "The Four Seasons," an episode called "Maratona" set in Italy, and an excellent "Rick and Morty" spin on the premise of "Severance," where we're introduced to the horror of Vacation Rick.  "Adventure Time: Fionna and Cake's" Karmic worm episode was also a contender for a long time, one of the weirdest and yet most comforting half hours I've seen in a while.

Finally, all my best to "The Late Show" crew for putting on several wonderful episodes in the closing weeks of the program, and everyone over at "Last Week Tonight" and "The Daily Show" for continuing the good fight.  I'm very aware that the most significant television episode of the past year was the
"60 Minutes" CECOT episode, which probably marked the true ending of the venerable news program for all intents and purposes.  It doesn't feel right to put it on a list like this, but I at least want to acknowledge it here.  

And while it's looking less and less likely that we'll get the full revival of "The Muppet Show," the special event version with Sabrina Carpenter was a wonderful trip down memory lane.  Seth Rogen, all is forgiven.  

That was my 2025-2026 season in television.  See you around.  

---

My Top Ten Episodes of 2025-2026

The amount of new shows on this list is very high compared to previous years.  Maybe it's because this feels like a transitional year in a lot of ways.  Maybe it's because a lot of the returning shows hit some bumps.  In any case, it was a good year for television and I have a lot to talk about.

A quick reminder before we start that I watch a lot of genre television, I'm notoriously bad with comedies, and I have a neverending "To Watch" list.  I use the Emmy rules for cutoff dates, which means that this list covers everything from the start of June, 2025 to the end of May, 2026.   Entries below are unranked, and I'm limiting myself to one episode per show or miniseries. 

I will endeavor to keep spoilers to a minimum, but please watch your step.  

Dexter: Resurrection, "Call Me Red" - Let's start with some fanservice.  The first few episodes of "Dexter; Resurrection" do a nice job of setting up a new status quo for Dexter and son in New York.  However, it's when the past rears up unexpectedly in the fourth episode that the series feels like it's really sliding back into a familiar groove and hits its stride.  Peter Dinklage as a rich eccentric is also one of the highlights of a wonderfully macabre, pulpy season.  

Death By Lightning, "The Man From Ohio" - This miniseries about the election and assassination of President James Garfield in the 1880s feels wonderfully immediate for a historical drama, thanks to a bumper crop of excellent performances.  The opening episode introduces us to all the main players, and sees Garfield win the nomination at the Republican convention - depicted as a chaotic, unpredictable event where political fortunes are made.

Pluribus, "Grenade" - I love science-fiction shows that really think about the consequences of the world-changing "what if" scenarios they create.  "Pluribus" is about nearly all humans becoming a collective consciousness, the ramifications of which are explored over the whole season.  "Grenade" is the first episode where we really get a dialogue between our heroine and the "Others," leading to so many, many more questions.  And a grenade!

Paradise, "Graceland" - The season two opener is one of the show's exceptional character deep-dives, this one about a Graceland tour guide, played by Shailene Woodley, and how she spent the apocalypse.  With barely any connection to the rest of "Paradise" until the very end, the episode does a great job of creating new stakes and goals while introducing us to the heretofore unseen world of the post-Apocalypse United States outside of Paradise.  

Task, "Out Beyond Ideas of Wrongdoing and Rightdoing, There is a River" - "Task" is a crime miniseries carefully written to balance two stories on opposing sides of the law, and here's where they finally collide.  Though the ending feels inevitable, it turns out that our antihero figure, Robbie Prendergrast still has a few aces up his sleeve.  And I appreciate that the show's finale gives the surviving characters a measure of grace in spite of all of their losses.   

Widow's Bay, "Beach Reads" - Honestly, I wasn't really feeling "Widow's Bay" until this episode, where the perspective shifts to the character of Patricia, and we get a fantastic parody of folkloric horror media.  It's executed so beautifully, with all these little visual details and hints as to what's actually happening, plus the scary bits are actually pretty scary.  This and Patricia's later faceoff with the local serial killer were easily the best parts of a great first season.

The Lowdown, "The Sensitive Kind,"  - This episode wraps up all of the season's mysteries, and delivers a surprising amount of justice.  It could even be mistaken for a happy ending, thanks to Ethan Hawke's scrappy journalist character finally accepting that the best way to tell the truth about a dead man is to honor his wishes.  Of course, this still takes some work.  I have this in my notes as the one where Keith David's put upon PI ends up on bovine muscle relaxers. 

Heated Rivalry, "The Cottage" - If you want a feel-good ending, however, there was none better than the capper to the first season of "Heated Rivalry."  The show started out with steamy secret hookups, and ended with Shane and Ilya tentatively acknowledging that they're in a full-blown romantic relationship.  And the unexpected thrills and laughs that come with finally admitting this to themselves (and a few others) made for some absolutely sublime television. 

DTF St. Louis, "Missouri Mutual Life & Health Insurance Company" - How do I describe this episode or this show?  Let's just say it's about three middle aged people and their complicated relationships.  This one focuses on Linda Cardellini's Carol, whose efforts to save her husband from his own worst impulses seem to be doomed, possibly giving her a motive to kill him.  It also features the most unlikely and instantly iconic musical moment of the year.

Only in Monroe, "May 22 202" - The last episode of "The Late Show" with Stephen Colbert interviewing a Beatle was fine.  However, it feels like his return to hosting the "Only in Monroe" public television talk show, less than 24 hours later, was where he really got to let loose.  Featuring Jeff Daniels as guest, and Jack White as sidekick/musical director, Colbert spent an hour doing much more absurdist and free-form comedy than his old job ever allowed for.  And it was fantastic.

Honorable mention: The "Lord of the Flies" miniseries

---

"Project Hail Mary" Scores

"Project Hail Mary" is the closest thing to a movie that I was guaranteed to enjoy.  It's comedic science-fiction, a genre I adore.  It's Phil Lord and Christopher Miller directing, with a Drew Goddard script based on the Andy Weir novel.  It stars Ryan Gosling as a perpetually scruffy middle school science teacher named Ryland Grace, who got himself kicked out of the scientific establishment years ago, but is now being recruited to help save the world.  A bunch of microscopic space critters called astrophage are feeding on the sun, you see, and causing it to dim.  The loss of energy spells doom for life on Earth unless they can figure out how to stop it.  But though the stakes are high, the movie is anything but glum, making great use of Gosling's comedic talents, and a boatload of fancy special effects.  And if you don't want any spoilers for the movie, you should probably stop reading here and go watch it.

Still with me?  I read Weir's Project Hail Mary a year ago in anticipation for the film, and enjoyed it.  The movie is a very good adaptation that left out a lot of the science, but surprisingly kept in almost everything else.  This means that the pacing is a little rough, particularly the sped-up ending, but there are also a few nice additions, like humanizing Eva Stratt (Sandra Huller), the implacable task force leader in charge of Project Hail Mary.  The biggest change is that the movie focuses more on the relationship between Grace and the alien he meets light years away from home, a faceless rock-creature that Grace names Rocky (James Ortiz).  The narrative is split between Grace in the present day on the Hail Mary spaceship, and his muddled but gradually returning memories of his work on Earth, and how he ended up on this mission.  Smartly, the filmmakers decide to skip most of the early introductory stuff in the book and just get straight to Grace and Rocky meeting, learning to communicate, and becoming best cross-species science bros.  

The Golden Globes got a lot of guff for classifying the last movie based on an Andy Weir book, "The Martian," as a comedy.   I don't want to hear any of those complaints about "Project Hail Mary" when this inevitably happens again, because it is absolutely a buddy comedy, without question.  The movie has its moments of spacefaring awe and wonder, but what keeps it so engaging is watching Grace and Rocky interacting on a personal level, and figuring out how to help each other in their shared missions.  Gosling's Ryland Grace leans heavily on goofy humor as a defense mechanism, which Lord and Miller enable wherever they can.  The slapstick is fun, but it's the subtler stuff that really got to me.  Grace's collection of dorky knitwear and thematically appropriate T-shirts is perfect.  

Rocky is already iconic, a cinematic alien that looks like no other.  He is essentially a mobile pile of rocks that is configured like a five-legged spider.  Rocky has no face, but is very articulate with his multiple arms, insectoid digits, and musical vocalizations.  Eventually he is given a human voice via Grace's translation program, but the most important part of his performance is physical.  He gestures.  He dances.  He mimics.  He gets across a wide range of emotions from happiness to fear to deadpan exasperation simply with body language.  Rocky was reportedly mostly performed with puppets and animatronics, which likely contributed to the very effective screen chemistry that Rocky shares with Ryan Gosling onscreen.  

"Project Hail Mary" works great as an optimistic, feel-good space adventure, and arrives at a time when audiences are very receptive to it.  And I think it's the optimism that's the important part, as someone who loves science-fiction but has been weary of the overabundance of dystopian fiction in recent years.  The more cerebral parts of the book mostly end up in the margins of the movie, which is probably for the best.  One thing about the film that caught my attention was that its pop culture references were pretty dated - "Rocky," "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," and the Beatles.  But then again, that is also fitting, as "Project Hail Mary" successfully evokes the spirit of that age of space exploration where we didn't automatically believe that the aliens were bad, or the mission was hopeless.  And we could certainly use more movies with that mindset going forward.         

—

The 2025-2026 Television I Didn't Watch

In advance of my top ten episodes list for the 2025-2026 season (I use the Emmy eligibility calendar), I want to talk about some of the shows that I didn't watch this year.  There seem to be more and more every year, so the titles discussed below are only the most high-profile ones that I actually have something to say about.  I reserve the right to revisit these choices in the future, but I still haven't seen anything from last year's list.

"Bait" - This is the Riz Ahmed series about a British Pakistani actor who is auditioning for James Bond.  And that's one of the most interesting and daring ideas for a show that I've heard about in a long while, and kudos to Amazon Prime for letting him do it.  However, I've long had an aversion to shows about actors and showbiz satires (still haven't gotten around to "Hacks") and "Bait" was putting up a lot of red flags on that front.  So despite the good notices, it's getting a pass for now.  

"Chief of War" - Here's another ambitious passion project, a historical drama about the clashes among the various tribes of the Hawaiian islands.  Jason Momoa stars as a warrior chief in the late 18th century who would play an instrumental role in the unification of Hawaii.  The dialogue is largely native Hawaiian, and the cast features an impressive collection of Pacific Islander actors.  And do I like epic war stories enough to watch nine episodes of this?  Not really, no.  

"I Love LA"  I really like Rachel Sennott in everything that I've seen her in.   However, I'm still at that age where comedies about attractive young people trying to get their post-graduate lives together don't have much appeal for me.  I think I lasted all of three episodes of "Girls," and with "I Love LA" I already knew it wasn't going to happen.  The cast also features Odessa A'Zion who was so great in "Marty Supreme," Josh Hutcherson, and a ton of celebrity cameos. 

"IT: Welcome to Derry" - This should have been right up my alley.  I love Stephen King.  However, this is a prequel to the Andy Muschietti "IT" movies, and one of those was okay and the other was pretty bad.  I'm also wary of the shared universe style spinoff shows that aren't directly based on King's work, so I've put this one and the Hulu show "Castle Rock" aside for now, to possibly come back to after I've finished all the other King series I haven't gotten around to yet.  

"The Chair Company" - Well, I watched the Tim Robinson film "Friendship," and I didn't connect with it at all, so I don't think I'm going to do any better with his latest television series, which has been described as a paranoid thriller and absurdist black comedy about a guy who becomes obsessed with a chair manufacturing company.  I think I'd probably start with episodes of "I Think You Should Leave" if I want to dip my toes into the Tim Robinson universe again.

"Half Man" - I have heard some fantastic things about this series, which is Richard Gadd' follow-up to "Baby Reindeer."  Gadd is playing a completely different character here, one of two brothers who share an intense and troubling relationship.   The other lead is Jamie Bell, who has always been good in everything I've seen him in.  The trouble here is the sheer intensity of the content.  Just reading some of the episode synopses had me cringing, so I'm going to keep my distance.

"Rooster" - Bill Lawrence has created a lot of good shows, and Steve Carrell is a dependable leading man.  The ensemble, which includes Danielle Deadwyler, Phil Dunster, and John C. McGinley, is also very tempting.  However, this came out around the same time as the college campus romance "Vladimir," and not too long after I finished the college episodes of "Man on the Inside," and more middle-aged campus hijinks were just not something I had the mental space for.

"Young Sherlock" - I like Sherlock Holmes media.  But Guy Ritchie doing Sherlock Holmes?  A young, cocky, arrogant Sherlock Holmes whose intellect is submerged under about a mile of bravado?  Yeah, no thanks.

---

"Wuthering Heights" and "The Bride!"

Emerald Fennell made a new version of "Wuthering Heights," and Maggie Gyllenhaal did a new take on "The Bride of Frankenstein" called "The Bride!" and I need to talk about these two together.  Both take the original stories and rework them into something different, using anachronistic elements, a lot of camp, and a lot of emphasis on style over substance.  Both function as star vehicles for their leading ladies - Margot Robbie and Jessie Buckley respectively.  I think one movie mostly works and one mostly doesn't, but both are so bold and display so much ambition that I have to offer my sincerest appreciation to everyone involved for getting the 2026 "Wuthering Heights" and "The Bride!" to the big screen in their current forms.  If nothing else, these movies are big, uninhibited, and more than a little bit bonkers.  And I love that.  

"Wuthering Heights" starts out mostly following the plot of the Emily Bronte novel, with the impoverished but headstrong Catherine Earnshaw (Margot Robbie) growing up with her foundling adopted brother Heathcliff (Jacob Elordi) under the questionable care or Cathy's dissolute father (Martin Clunes).  To improve her family's fortunes Cathy marries a rich neighbor, Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif), though she really loves Heathcliff.  He disappears and returns many years later, unexpectedly rich, and Cathy finds her feelings for him have only increased.  And then the movie ditches Bronte and never looks back.  Cathy and Heathcliff's love affair is the centerpiece of the film, full of torrid imagery and scandalous behavior, but little actual sex.  Some of their encounters feel anticipatory of magazine photo spreads, with over-the-top costuming, dramatic color palettes, and increasingly campy, horny, and downright bizarre expressions of desire.  

And this all would have probably gone over a lot better if the movie wasn't called "Wuthering Heights," (the quotation marks are not optional) and the characters weren't called Cathy and Heathcliff.  As an adaptation, frankly the movie isn't even trying.  It tones down the notoriously cruel and damaged characters to the point of toothlessness.  It tacks on a hurried and compromised new ending that kneecaps any sense of the larger themes of the original novel.  If you have no familiarity with the original "Wuthering Heights," the new adaptation comes across as a messy, but fairly harmless bodice-ripper pastiche with a nice Charlie XCX score, inventive production design, and some amusingly trashy plot twists.  Robbie and Elordi do have some chemistry with each other, and understand the assignment - playing at a heightened, unhinged version of romance that doesn't need to make any kind of sense.  It would have probably been more entertaining if Fennell had fully embraced the darker, more sexually deviant elements that kept being hinted at, but alas this isn't "Saltburn," and nobody gets to be truly nasty in this universe.

On to "The Bride!" which is definitely guilty of trying to do too much.  Set in 1930s Chicago, Jessie Buckley plays a dual role as gun moll named Ida, and the spirit of Mary Shelley who possesses Ida one evening, full of rage and unfulfilled creative need.  This leads to Ida's tragic death and subsequent resurrection by Dr. Cornelia Euphronius (Annette Bening), who is working at the behest of a curious newcomer to the city named "Frank" (Christian Bale).  And I suppose it's not really a spoiler that "Frank" turns out to be the monster created by Dr. Frankenstein over a century ago, which means that both the monster and his creator, Mary Shelley, are characters in this movie.  The resurrected Ida, who I will now refer to as The Bride, goes on a journey of discovery exploring her identity, monstrosity, and capability for love and violence.  

"The Bride!" strikes out in a totally original direction from its very first frames, so we don't have to worry much about the source material here.  However, it's a very chaotic film that combines horror, gangster, camp, romance, and even musical elements with a big dose of metatextual commentary.  Trying to follow the "Bonnie and Clyde" plot feels like an exercise in futility, especially when a pair of detectives played by Peter Skarsgaard and Penelope Cruz show up to be boring.  However, when the movie is following Frank and The Bride, it's very watchable.  The performances are good - very good, even.  It's worth seeing the movie just to watch Jessie Buckley play The Bride with so much exuberant freakishness.  I've seen mixed reactions to the inclusion of Mary Shelley, who keeps breaking into the narrative with her rambling interjections, but I thought she was great, especially after I turned on the closed captioning so I could better parse what she was saying.      

However, the movie is simply too scattered and underdeveloped to leave much impact.  "Poor Things" was a much more subversive, more coherent take on a feminist "Frankenstein" narrative.  By comparison, "The Bride!" feels far too slick and surface level.  It's also often preoccupied with its references to Herman Melville, Mel Brooks, and 1930s movies, which are all jumbled up in increasingly obscure configurations.  I don't feel like "The Bride!" wasted my time, but I don't feel I got much out of it either, beyond a few good scenes in isolation and the most WTF needle drop of the year.  It's one of those movies that is so singular and strange that I'm happy it exists to be puzzled over, like "Megalopolis," even though I didn't vibe with it.   I also find it encouraging that Maggie Gyllenhaal got to make this at a major studio, which means that riskier films, made on this scale, are still occasionally possible.  

---