Initially I wasn't going to watch "Sugar," because I had a pretty significant chunk of the show spoiled for me, and I wasn't too keen on watching a moody detective noir starring Colin Farrell. Farrell used to be one of the actors I had an irrational aversion to, which has slowly gone away over the years, but I didn't want to press my luck. However, I learned that the main character, a private eye named John Sugar, was a film buff. And the modern day Los Angeles detective noir he was inhabiting, created by Mark Protosevich, had a habit of splicing in clips from old films like "Sunset Boulevard," "The Night of the Hunter," and "The Thing." As a cinephile, I decided that I had to see this.
John Sugar is a mystery man who speaks multiple languages, is indestructible in a fight, and leads a pretty lonely existence. He gets his cases from a woman named Ruby (Kirby) and seems to have a lot of friends who are worried about him. His latest assignment is to find the missing granddaughter of a film mogul, Jonathan Siegel (James Crowmwell), which means digging into the lives of the troubled Siegel family - father Bernie (Dennis Boutsikaris), his ex-wife Melanie (Amy Ryan), current wife Margit (Anna Gunn), and unstable son David (Nate Corddry). There's also a local gangster in the equation, Stallings (Eric Lange), who is involved with the drug trade and human trafficking.
Farrell makes a great film noir protagonist, and I'm glad that I watched "Sugar" for his performance at least. I've seen a lot of older film noir in the past year for other projects, and John Sugar is a nice mix of classic brooding hero and eager fanboy in love with the persona, and still a mystery man underneath it all. The show is told from his highly subjective POV, with narration of course, which is why the film clips keep showing up. As Sugar works on the case, we see stream-of-consciousness flashes of whatever he's thinking about - memories and related associations mostly. The implication is that Sugar is as preoccupied with the unreal as he is with the real. Five of the episodes, including the pilot, were directed by Fernando Meirelles, whose style is a great fit.
As with all detective stories, the ensemble has a big impact and "Sugar" has a solid one. The Siegels are an opportunity to paint a picture of the dark underbelly of Hollywood, and Protosevich and the other writers don't hold back. The nasty arc of David Siegel in particular is very well done, with Corddry playing an immediately hateable twerp of a villain, and Lange a much more menacing one. It's always nice to see Kirby and Amy Ryan in anything, and I was glad that Ryan snagged the love interest role. Though the show takes place in the here and now, everyone in it feels like they're in a proper film noir, with all the old character types and tropes effortlessly.
As I previously mentioned, I had one of the show's big reveals spoiled for me, which unfortunately did impact my watching experience. I was able to appreciate how well the series was structured and all the little ambiguities and hints leading up to the reveal, but I felt I'd missed out on most of the fun. If you're curious about "Sugar" and have gotten this far, I urge you to not read anything else about the show and go watch it. As a film noir it's pretty good, but as a film noir wrapped in a more experimental kind of narrative, it's far more interesting. And though I did enjoy "Sugar" as a character study, I know I would have liked it better as the genre mystery it was intended to be.
---