These two movies opened head to head on the same weekend, and one flopped while the other didn't. I like them both for different reasons.
First, Edgar Wright's adaptation of Richard Bachman's "The Running Man" is an ambitious, noble failure, which makes it the far more interesting option. Set in a future dystopia where the slightest rebellion means unemployment and poverty, a down-on-his luck father named Ben Richards (Glen Powell) signs on as a participant in the popular televised death game, "The Running Man." His goal is to survive for thirty days without being killed, either by the public or by a team of professional "Hunters," to win a billion dollars. This also means staying ahead of the omnipresent surveillance state, and the vile behind-the-scenes machinations of the show's producer Dan Killian (Josh Brolin), who deals in misinformation and propaganda to sway his audience's sympathies.
The worldbuilding of "The Running Man" is the best thing about it, offering a sobering look at a society where the flow of information is entirely controlled by the "execs," who subjugate the poor with impunity, and can deepfake anything except the ineffable human element to keep their death games interesting to the public. There are so many well-considered little details, like public services being rationed, and a thriving black market in old CRT televisions that don't watch you back. Wright and co-writer Michael Bacall have a lot of targets, spoofing the Kardashians and breakfast cereal ads among other things, but they spend most of their time on the rich/poor divide, passive consumption, and the culture of distraction. "The Running Man" can only operate the way it does because Killian and the host Bobby T (Colman Domingo) make up lies about the contestants and paint them in the worst light possible, prompting the public to hate them, thus making it okay to enjoy their deaths.
Unfortunately, the part of "The Running Man" that's supposed to be a fun action film gets compromised in the process. Glen Powell does fine at being a sympathetic action hero, but the script has some fundamental issues. It's too long, it's repetitive, and the ending has every sign of trying to shoehorn a happier ending into the movie at the last minute. Ben Richards has encounters with a lot of different allies and foes over the course of the game, including Michael Cera, Lee Pace, Emilia Jones, Karl Glusman, Daniel Ezra, and William H. Macy. Some of these are a lot of fun, but there's a curious lack of the kind of inventive, idiosyncratic action sequences that Edgar Wright is best known for. The action's not bad, but there are only two sections where Wright really feels like he's letting loose, and the rest are pretty generic. The tone is also frequently a little too dark and dour - too much "Minority Report," and not enough "Robocop." The movie does some things well, and I absolutely think it's worth seeing, but this is not the "Running Man" reboot or the Edgar Wright blockbuster I think most of the fans were hoping for.
I also want to say a little bit about "Now You See Me: Now You Don't," which is the third of the "Now You See Me" films. Ruben Fleischer is in the director's chair this time, and we have a quartet of new screenwriters, who actually manage a halfway decent story. It's still not much of a story, but at least it's not the complete bungle that the first one was, and has more interesting stakes than the second. Every member of The Four Horsemen magician team from the original film is back for this one, including Atlas (Jesse Eisenberg), Merritt (Woody Harrelson), and Jack (Dave Franco), plus Isla Fischer as Henley, who sat out the last installment. They're joined by a trio of young up-and-comers, Bosco (Dominic Sessa), June (Ariana Greenblatt), and Charlie (Justice Smith), with the goal of stealing a very big diamond from a two-faced South African mining heiress, Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike).
The "Now You See Me" films are full of impossible magic tricks that aren't all that impressive, because nearly all of them are accomplished with basic editing tricks and CGI. However, they're still fun to watch because they're executed with a lot of theatrical style and bombast, and the actors get to play big and broad. This time the character dynamics involve a lot of intergenerational sniping between the two teams - the Jesse Eisenberg and Dominic Sessa animosity is amusingly dorky - and the Horsemen have been split up for a long time due to some offscreen drama. There are a lot of secrets to be revealed and a big twist, of course, but this one played fair, and did the setups and payoffs properly. It was clunky and predictable, but I appreciate the effort.
I don't know that I need more of these, especially as the franchise seems to be trying to set itself up as "The Fast & The Furious" with magicians, but the movies are pleasantly diverting enough that I don't mind if they stick around.
---