Wednesday, August 29, 2018

The Return of the Russians

I've been watching a lot of media about the Russians lately, all of it pretty grim and unhappy. There's Francis Lawrence's "Red Sparrow," a thriller starring Jennifer Lawrence as a Bolshoi ballerina who is manipulated into becoming a sexy spy under the control of corrupt government officials. Armando Iannucci's "The Death of Stalin" gives us a nihilistic picture of sneaky power grabs and petty rivalries directing the course of Soviet history. Then there's the final season of "The Americans," presenting a more nuanced picture of Russia in the '80s, struggling with modernization and opening up. I still have a few episodes to go, but the Russian characters have all remained pretty miserable throughout the series, and there's clearly no happy ending waiting for any of them.

After being mostly phased out by the end of the Cold War, Russian baddies are back in vogue thanks to recent events, and I'm ever so glad. After the events of 9/11, we had years of swarthy Middle Eastern terrorist villains, occasionally played by actors who were not remotely Middle Eastern, and portrayed in consistently problematic if not outright racist ways. The Russians, though, are classic cinematic nogoodniks who have been synonymous with nefarious plots for so long that filmmakers don't have to worry so much about representation issues or giving the other side a fair shake. Put a couple of stone-faced Northern European actors in cold weather clothing, have them brush up on their Slavic and Baltic accents, and you're all set. They are a remarkably guilt-free choice of antagonist, especially for action films.

For me, the Russians bring back happy memories of Sean Connery aboard a stealth submarine, Famke Janssen asphyxiating people with her thighs, and Dolph Lundgren menacing his opponents in the boxing ring. It was a simpler time, when you could get away with broad stereotypes of America's major rivals. And like the Nazis, the Soviets are so wonderfully cinematic, easily caricatured into over-the-top villains and antiheroes. One of the only notable things about that last "Indiana Jones" movie was its stern Soviet villainess Irina Spalko, played by Cate Blanchett. And speaking of Dolph Lundgren, the upcoming "Creed" sequel is promising to deliver quite a few wallops of nostalgia as Donnie goes up against Drago Jr. If the movie turns out to be remotely as ridiculous as "Rocky IV," I will be overjoyed.

Of course, the evil Communist has become a pretty lazy stock character over the years, one that could do with some improvements and updates. The Boris and Natasha accents, the bulky overcoats, and the deadpan stoicism, that are somehow still being trotted out, feel positively prehistoric in the current era of sexy Putin memes, Adidas track suits, and an endless array of dashcam disasters. Speaking of the dashcam videos, those got their own documentary by Dmitrii Kalashnikov called "The Road Movie" that premiered earlier this year. I've heard very good things. And I expect that the inevitable dramatizations of the recent Russiagate scandals involving Russian troll farms, pop stars, and shady industrialists should help speed things up in that regard. The material is so juicy, Hollywood's going to be mining this for years, if not decades.

And who knows? Maybe the increased attention on Russia will actually help generate some positive interest too. The Russians may be guilt-free antagonists, but that doesn't mean they should be. I appreciate that Guillermo Del Toro's "The Shape of Water" made its Russian spy character one of the good guys, as part of the film's subversion of classic monster movie tropes. I loved that the Brian Cox's similar character in 2010's "RED" got the girl in the end. Russian filmmakers like Alexander Sokurov and Andrey Zvyagintsev have been doing fantastic work for years, but are mostly unknown to those outside of art house circles. Somebody has got to make that Putin biopic eventually, preferably with Matthias Schoenaerts as the lead. Seriously, did you see him in "Red Sparrow"?

I've been hoping that Marvel would take the plunge and make Black Widow movie for a while now, and it looks like it may finally happen in the near future. But even if that never pans out, there's going to be plenty of Russian themed media at the cineplexes for a long while to come.

And I'll have my full write-up on the end of "The Americans" up soon, with a Top Ten list to follow.

---

Friday, August 24, 2018

The James Gunn Situation

I've been putting off writing about this one, but now that Disney has decided not to rehire James Gunn for "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3," it's time to tackle the bear.  To recap, a few weeks ago an alt-right nogoodnik dug up some of James Gunn's old tweets from years ago, full of off-color shock humor including rape and pedophilia jokes. Disney fired him from "Guardians," and he's stayed fired, in spite of a vigorous campaign by many of the MCU luminaries for the Mouse House to reconsider.  The case has been made that Gunn showed poor judgment making those tweets, but he's considerably matured since then, to the point that he's become an important ally in the #Metoo movement. He's also been a vocal critic of Donald Trump.

And that's exactly why the alt-right targeted him.  His dismissal was meant to be a retaliatory shot back against the firing of Roseanne Barr over the Valerie Jarrett tweet.  Dan Harmon, who has also been a critic of the alt-right, was also targeted. In his case, an old comedy sketch involving pedophilia was unearthed.  It was distasteful, but clearly scripted humor, and Harmon apologized for it. Nonetheless, Harmon quit Twitter, and other prominent celebs like Rian Johnson have deleted years worth of social media activity.  Emboldened, the alt-right has since gone after reporters and other media figures, trying to provoke witch hunts or get them fired. There was that recent kerfuffle over the New York Times hiring Sarah Jeong, a tech writer who made controversial tweets disparaging white people - or was it disparaging white hegemony?  Meanwhile, notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has been kicked off of several sites for hate speech - but notably not Twitter.

I shouldn't be surprised that Twitter continues to generate drama left and right, given how President Trump has been using it.  I've watched its gradual weaponization these past few months with dismay, and the continued fumblings of the Twitter management itself with annoyance.  All the major social networking sites like Facebook and Youtube have been struggling to keep their platforms from being abused by the trolls and propagandists.  Twitter's efforts, however, seem to have been the most ineffectual. I mean, I can understand their dilemma to some extent - it's hard to draw hard lines about content when the President is lying and threatening people through Twitter every day with total impunity.  However, it's also telling that celebrities are now regularly quitting Twitter over bullying by an endless flood of reprobates who seem to see no consequences for their bad behavior.

I've always been a little paranoid about the Internet, and recent events have mostly been proving me right.  Social media often feels like a private arena, where you can let down your guard and converse casually with people.  Of course it's not, and context often gets lost, and sarcasm and irony don't come across well. It's easy to read bad intentions into flippant, snarky communications.  I don't think that anything about those old shock tweets that James Gunn made were funny, but I don't believe for a minute that he actually believes or advocates for those things either.  I'm sure the alt-right doesn't believe it either - but the outrage sure is easy to feign. Remember when "fake news" was originally a criticism directed at conservative astroturfers?

However, as much as I detest the alt-right hooligans who spearheaded this witch hunt, and the sympathize with James Gunn, I think that Disney made the right call.  Their firing of Gunn is consistent with how they handled the Roseanne Barr situation, and minimizes collateral damage to the rest of their Marvel projects. And it should be emphasized that this is Disney we're talking about.  Their family-friendly brand is everything. Even though Gunn was joking, the tweets were heinous enough that Disney couldn't take the risk of being even peripherally associated with them. The rules about social media have changed since Gunn was initially hired for the first "Guardians of the Galaxy," and frankly so has his status as a public figure.  

In the end, James Gunn not getting to direct "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3" isn't a great loss.  Gunn is a talented director who is already being courted for other projects. The "Guardians" franchise will be perfectly fine in other hands.  And if this is what it takes for people to realize that what they post on the internet is always going to be in the public for everyone to see, and Twitter is nobody's friend, that may end up being a small price to pay.  

---

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

My Top Ten "Teen Titans" Episodes

With the new "Titans" series incoming, and a new animated movie in theaters based on Cartoon Network's "Teen Titans Go!" I thought it was a good time to look back on the first "Teen Titans" animated series that aired back in 2003-2006. I wasn't watching many American cartoons by that point, being deep in my otaku phase, but I always enjoyed it. Below, find my Top Ten for the series Entries are unranked and ordered by air date. Spoilers will be kept to a minimum.

"Nevermore" - Raven is my favorite character, being the ultimate moody, introverted teenage girl who just wants to angst in peace. Her arc is all about letting people into her world, and it's a very strange one as Cyborg and Beast Boy discover here. I love the spooky imagery and the different versions of Raven that make an appearance. Alas, the series never really revisited most of these concepts, though Raven would get a lot of attention later on.

"Mad Mod" - The Malcolm McDowell voiced the British villain Mad Mod turns the Titans' world upside down with his reality-warping holograms and robots. The episode is one big homage to the psychedelic '60s and British animation, including Terry Gilliam's work on "Monty Python" and the Beatles' "Yellow Submarine." Of course, "Clockwork Orange" gets a reference too. Of the "Teen Titans'" sillier, wackier episodes, this one was easily my favorite.

"Apprentice Part II" - The first season culminates in a two-parter and Robin having his big showdown with Slade, who is the show's best villain. Voiced by Ron Perlman, Slade is a legitimately creepy and intimidating presence, but still appropriate for a kids' show. This episode also marks the occasion by throwing in the most blatant Batman references that would ever appear in "Teen Titans." Not that the show needs any of Batman's mojo by this point.

"How Long Is Forever?" - The second season starts off with a bang. Starfire is sent to the future to see what becomes of the Titans when they are no longer a team. I always like "darkest timeline" stories, and this is no exception, though things are kept very kid-friendly with a nice lesson and a happy ending to wrap things up. It's also a good showcase for Starfire, the lovable alien girl who one of the show's better creations. I just wish we could have seen her future too.

"Terra" - I always liked the Terra and Beast Boy relationship because these two act like real kids, have a lot of baggage, and make so many mistakes. Terra becoming one of the big players in the second season always felt a little toothless compared to how things played out in the comics, but I liked the earlier episodes of her with the Titans. There's enough ambiguity there to be interesting, without the full force of the teen melodrama erupting just yet.

"Birthmark" - Boy is this an eventful birthday for Raven, and we eventually find out the reasons why she's so loathe to celebrate. Her big arc in the fourth season is a metaphor for dealing with an abusive past, and this is the episode that kicks it all off. The nightmarish scenes with Raven and Trigon are really pushing the show's usual limits, but they're also very effective. And so is the ending with her friends still trying to be there for her when it counts.

"The End Part 3" - It's very satisfying to watch Raven stand up to her fears and to the villain Trigon. The whole three-part finale is a lot of fun with the temporary alliance with an old enemy, evil doppelgangers, and a lot of fancy magical fighting. However, Raven getting to let loose and power up was definitely my favorite bit. She never really got the spotlight in the same way after this, but that was fine with me. The fourth season gave her plenty.

"Lightspeed" - None of the regulars appeared in this episode, but it might be my favorite of the series. Jinx, a villain character who barely got any development in earlier episodes, finds herself at a moral crossroads. She can choose villainy and follow in the footsteps of her idol, Madame Rouge, or listen to the advice of the infuriating superhero Kid Flash, and walk away from the fight. It's a very sweet, very well executed little stand-alone story.

"Calling All Titans" and "Titans Together" - The big series finale is probably a little too much of a good thing, but I love that everyone gets to go out on a big brawl. The storyline with Beast Boy leading a team of the leftover hero kids is really appealing. Notably, this is not the end of the series, though. The last episode is the thoughtful epilogue "Things Change," which is a very brave story that I'm giving Honorable Mention status, but it's not as much fun as the episodes that preceded it.

---

Monday, August 20, 2018

An Update on Disney's 2019 and Beyond

Roughly a year ago, Disney's release schedule for 2019 looked like this:

“Captain Marvel” (3D) — Mar. 8, 2019
“Dumbo” (3D) — Mar. 29, 2019
Untitled Disneytoon Studios — April 12, 2019
Untitled “Avengers” (3D) — May 3, 2019
“Aladdin” (3D) — May 24, 2019
“Toy Story 4” — June 21, 2019
“The Lion King” (3D) — July 19, 2019
“Artemis Fowl” (3D) — Aug. 9, 2019
“Nicole” — Nov. 8, 2019
“Frozen 2” — Nov. 27, 2019
“Star Wars: Episode IX” (3D) — Dec. 20, 2019

There have only been a few changes.  Disneytoon Studios has been shut down and their project cancelled.  The Anna Kendrick Christmas movie "Nicole" is now "Noelle" and set to premiere on Disney's new streaming service along with "Magic Camp," which was pulled from the 2018 release slate and replaced with "Christopher Robin."  There's also been a notable addition. Last December, Sony announced the "Spider-man" sequel, "Far From Home," would be released July 5th. So now, the schedule looks like this:

“Captain Marvel” (3D) — Mar. 8, 2019
“Dumbo” (3D) — Mar. 29, 2019
“Avengers 4” (3D) — May 3, 2019
“Aladdin” (3D) — May 24, 2019
“Toy Story 4” — June 21, 2019
"Spider-Man: Far From Home" - July 5, 2019  
“The Lion King” (3D) — July 19, 2019
“Artemis Fowl” (3D) — Aug. 9, 2019
“Frozen 2” — Nov. 27, 2019
“Star Wars: Episode IX” (3D) — Dec. 20, 2019

Now the summer is even more crowded with big titles, none of which appear to be budging.  I'd assumed that the live action "Aladdin" or "The Lion King" might be delayed to space out the releases more, but there's no indication that this is happening.  I can still see "Avengers" being bumped up to April, though, to match the release pattern of the last installment.

Last time around, I thought that the schedule was massively overloaded and the movies were doomed to cannibalize each other.  Right now, I'm dead sure that this is going to happen, especially after how Disney's slate performed in 2018. They released four tentpoles over the summer, "Avengers: Infinity War," "Solo," "Incredibles 2," and "Ant-Man and the Wasp."  "Solo" significantly underperformed, for reasons that remain much debated, but part of the problem seems to be that it came out too soon after "The Last Jedi," and had a lot of bad press and bad buzz around it.

Now, if "Aladdin" and "The Lion King" can differentiate themselves enough from each other, maybe they can both make money.  I'm not counting on it though - I expect "Aladdin" will be the likeliest loser in the group, with few major stars and the highly hit-or-miss Guy Ritchie at the helm.  It's got essentially the same slot on the calendar as "Solo," which is not a good sign. There have also been a few rumblings of discontent related to the cultural sensitivity of the production - nothing major, but worth keeping an eye on.  From the bits of marketing released so far, this thing is going to live or die with Will Smith's ability to sell the Genie. Twenty years ago, no sweat, but today?

Now keep in mind that I want "Aladdin," "The Lion King," and 2020's "Mulan" to do well, because Disney is trying socially-conscious casting and some other interesting things here.  These aren't going to be carbon copies of the animated films the way that "Beauty and the Beast" unfortunately turned out. However, Disney is not doing themselves any favors jamming so many of these titles together into the same few months.  Tim Burton's live action "Dumbo" will also be coming out in March, remember. That's the one I'm actually the most skeptical about. (Why is this move written by schlockmeister Ehren Kruger and starring Colin Farrell?!)

And we might as well start prepping for Disney's equally crowded 2020 too, where we have to factor Fox's releases in.  Here's the slate so far:
      
Untitled Disney live-action film - February 14, 2020
Untitled Pixar film - March 6, 2020
"Mulan," - March 27, 2020
Untitled Marvel Studios film - May 1, 2020
"Maleficent II" - May 29, 2020
Untitled Pixar film - June 19, 2020
Untitled Marvel / Fox film - June 26, 2020
Untitled Marvel Studios film - July 31, 2020
Untitled Marvel / Fox film - October 2, 2020
Untitled Disney live-action film - October 9, 2020
Untitled Marvel Studios film - November 6, 2020
Untitled Disney animated film - November 25, 2020
Untitled Disney live-action film - December 23, 2020   

Hmmm…. They're being awfully tight-lipped compared to last year.  

---

Friday, August 17, 2018

What's Film Twitter?



Readers of the blog know that I quit Twitter a while back, after using my account to do little more than post updates for this blog. I never got the hang of using it to have real conversations with other people, though I found it a good way to keep up with various film critics and filmmakers. That was five years ago, which is practically ancient times the way the internet works. I think I may want to give Twitter another try sometime soon.

Over the past few years I've been hearing repeated references to "Film Twitter," which refers to the community of film critics, film academics, and various cinephiles who are active on Twitter. It's a big, shapeless, moveable feast of film discussion that you need to keep up with if you want to stay current on what's going on in film circles. This includes the discussion of films, film news, interviews, reviews, opinion and reaction pieces, and good, old fashioned gossip. I, not having time to read all the tweets generated by the handful of film critics I used to follow, let alone the dozens and dozens of film professionals that make up Film Twitter, have no hope of actually participating in any of these conversations. Still, it looks like it would be awfully fun to follow along.

Film Twitter is only one of many different Twitter communities. There's Politics Twitter, Music Twitter, Sports Twitter, and of course the endless amusement of Fast Food Twitter. When I hear mention of Film Twitter, it's usually through one of the participants, referencing prior or ongoing conversations. The concept of Film Twitter has been around since at least 2015, and has been steadily becoming more and more visible. First reactions to films are often gauged from tweets after early screenings, and major film festivals like Cannes are often accompanied by a flurry of increased activity. Last year there was a push to amplify more female voices. Some have tried to prognosticate box office returns and award season favorites based on Film Twitter trends - which are usually doomed to failure, of course, because the critics almost never reflect popular sentiment. Hype, however, can sometimes be generated or amplified there.

Lately I've started hearing Film Twitter referred to by some as a sort of monolithic entity, usually by those who are critical of the participants. There's a certain breed of film enthusiast who just loves writing off the perceived critical establishment as a bunch of pretentious phonies. Film Twitter provides a handy aggregate, so now it's regularly being accused of all sorts of things, like being smug, or being mean, or overreacting. This says more about the bellyachers than it does about the Film Twitter community, but I think it's also a sign of how Film Twitter is quietly growing in influence. For certain online critics, participation almost feels obligatory. And that's slightly worrisome, especially if you don't think that 140 character tweets are really the best format to be conveying nuanced opinions about cinema with.

Film Twitter remains fairly removed from the mainstream and has a certain degree of exclusivity because the major discussions often require that you have access to media at the time that it's released, or even earlier in the case of films playing the festival circuit or making the rounds via screeners. Right now, this definitely isn't the case for me and won't be for the foreseeable future. I watch nearly everything after it hits the second window viewing options - namely VOD and home media. By that point, everyone's moved on to other topics. I've gotten very used to catching up on film discussions months after they've happened, usually through articles and podcasts.

But even though I'm not a part of Film Twitter, I'm very, very comforted to know that it exists. After seeing so many of the old film discussion message boards on various sites shut down in recent years, and failing to find any good replacements, I'm happy to know that there is a forum for nerdy, critical film discussion out there on the internet. Nobody is going to shut down Twitter in a hurry. And that the film nerds are out there, somewhere, just waiting to geek out over the latest marvel blockbuster or Hirokazu Koreeda joint with.
---

Monday, August 13, 2018

My Top Ten Films of 1986

This is part of my continuing series looking back on films from the years before I began this blog. The ten films below are unranked and listed in no particular order. Enjoy.

The Fly - This is easily David Cronenberg's most commercial feature, but in many ways it is also the most pure distillation of his particular brand of body horror. There's a clarity and cohesion here that is often missing from his other, more cerebral films. At the same time, genre cinema rarely sese such measured treatment of guts and gore. The deterioration and transformation of our hero is executed via a spectacular combination of practical special effects, makeup, and Jeff Goldblum's performance. I also found the love story unusually affecting, giving the finale some real pathos.

Jean de Florette - The film is only the first half of a longer saga, concluded by "Manon of the Spring," However, "Jean" strikes me as the much stronger piece, not only because of the involvement of an excellent Gérard Depardieu, but because the themes in play are much more interesting. The struggle of Jean against the land and the elements, and the active deception being carried out by the villagers creates terrific tension and tragedy. It also gives the filmmakers the opportunity to really spotlight the gorgeous art direction and cinematography of the recreated Provence countryside.

Blue Velvet - One of the key works in David Lynch's strange, enthralling cinematic universe, where we first see him pair banal suburban melodrama with nightmarish horror. Much of the film's content remains shocking and upsetting, with Dennis Hopper's performance as deeply unnerving as ever. The imagery is indelible - the severed ear, the oxygen mask, and poor Isabella Rossellini in a scene of such graphic distress that it prompted outrage and criticism. The film has only grown more effective and fascinating with time, especially in the context of Lynch's later related output.

Sid and Nancy - Before Sid Vicious and Nancy Spungen fall victim to their notorious folie a deux of substance addictions and self-harm, they have a bloody good time thumbing their noses at polite society in this quintessential punk rocker biopic. From Gary Oldman's scalding recreation of Vicious' version of "My Way" to the tender make-out session in a trash-strewn alley, Alex Cox tells the counter-culture love story of his generation in energetically subversive cinematic terms. And though Cox may maintain that the story is cautionary, it's hard not to root for the delinquents and the creeps.

Manhunter - Violent criminals are creatures of the night, and no one creates nighttime worlds on film better than Michael Mann. This remains the best adaptation of Thomas Harris's "Red Dragon," delving into the ins and outs of serial killers and forensic psychology. Tom Noonan delivers a memorable performance as our killer, simultaneously sympathetic and monstrous. However, the film is largely driven by its intense atmosphere of dread, colorful nocturnal mise-en-scene, and a relentless soundtrack. It's still rare to find such an effective, thrilling crime procedural to this day.

The Sacrifice - Tarkovsky left us with this "poetic parable" as his final film, the story of a man who bargains with God in an attempt to avoid impending disaster. The final scene, contained all in a lengthy single shot, is a real jawdropper. A house is burned to the ground in real time, our main character appears to succumb to madness (or experience a profound religious awakening), and the audience is left to decide whether they have just witnessed a tragedy or a miracle. It's possibly the culminating achievement of Tarkovsky's entire career, and a cinematic experience that's impossible to forget.

The Mission - Part religious epic, part historical fiction, and part heaving melodrama, there's plenty that's problematic about "The Mission" upon close inspection. However, the sheer daring of the spectacle and the earnestness of the spiritual and moral questioning is something I miss in later films, and appreciate seeing here. And there is simply no questioning the brilliance of the cinematography, the score, and the production design. There are some profoundly moving moments here, the product of an absolutely committed group of filmmakers and performers working at the height of their craft.

Ferris Bueller's Day Off - Sure, it's fun to watch the hijinks that the kids get themselves into, and marvel at the cool confidence and daring of the seemingly untouchable Ferris. However, after a couple of viewings I realized that the film was actually about Cameron and Jeannie, and their journeys to enlightenment and self-acceptance. The self-aware, utterly indulgent script may be the most delightful thing that John Hughes ever wrote. And it's remained a surprisingly smart, insightful, and touching watch, decades after nearly everything else in the 1980s teen comedy genre went out of date.

Mona Lisa - An unusually sentimental gangster film that pairs a small time ex-con with a high class prostitute, and sees them become unlikely friends. This was an important picture in advancing the careers of both director Neil Jordan and star Bob Hoskins, who elevate some pretty well-worn material to pleasurable heights by mixing several genres, tones, and moods. British neo-noir never looked better than it does here, absolutely dripping with stylish sleaze and atmospheric cool, while Hoskins never delivered a more wonderfully humane and touching performance.

Stand By Me - Four boys go off an adventure together, getting into trouble, telling disgusting stories, and sharing the kind of secrets that only boys of a certain age will truly appreciate. By turns funny, poignant, gross, insightful, and nostalgic, Rob Reiner's "Stand By Me" remains one of the most enjoyable coming-of-age films ever made. It's certainly one of the most influential in terms of portraying kids and how they actually interact with each other. The performances are also unusually strong, probably because the young actors are largely playing themselves.

Honorable Mention:

Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer
---

Saturday, August 11, 2018

My Favorite Miloš Forman Film

I think it's fair to call "Amadeus" one of the formative films of my moviegoing life, a film I've watched many, many times over the years, both as a child and as an adult. When I was younger, I loved seeing the stagecraft and the pageantry of Mozart's world, the ostentatious period costumes and the grandeur of the Habsburg court of Emperor Joseph II. As I grew older, I learned to appreciate the use of the music, the performances, and the filmmaking. And when I was in college, I saw it for the first time in theaters, a Special Edition cut that added several scenes of more adult material.

That's when I began to appreciate "Amadeus" as a subversive film, about a bawdy, bad boy musician who rebels against authority in order to make the music that he wants. He's vulgar and irresponsible with money, fond of parties and excess, and is eventually brought down by his own ego. I started watching Miloš Forman's other films, noting similar themes in the counterculture musical "Hair," the Larry Flynt biopic, and perhaps the ultimate story of a man rebelling against the system, "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest." Note that nearly all of Forman's later films also end with the main character's self-destruction and untimely demise.

Forman had plenty of experience with rebellion and going to great lengths to make his art on his own terms. After distinguishing himself as a major talent in the Czechoslovakian New Wave in the '60s, and earning the ire of the government with the satirical "Fireman's Ball," Forman was ousted from the Czech film industry in the early '70s. A decade later, after finding success in Hollywood, he would return to shoot "Amadeus" in Prague. Like the madmen and creative geniuses who featured frequently in his films, Forman had a tendency to become obsessed with his projects, often unable to work on more than one at a time, and abandoning at least one major undertaking due to not being able to bear compromising his vision.

"Amadeus" isn't just about Mozart, but also his rival. Antonio Salieri (F. Murray Abraham) is one of my favorite characters in cinema, a successful composer who realizes that he's musically mediocre, and becomes increasingly jealous of the genius of Mozart (Tom Hulce), who he views as an obnoxious child. I'd have loved to see the celebrated Ian McKellan stage performance of Salieri brought to the screen, but Abraham's work here is unforgettable. The film widens the scope of the original play to show us a more complete and nuanced picture of Mozart, but it's still framed as Salieri's confession, and driven by his obsessions with God and music. His monologues have been transformed into conversations with his priest, allowing for more measured, more directed presentation of his observations as we watch Mozart's career progress.

This was typical of Forman's adaptations, which were faithful in spirit to the original works, but often drastically reworked in order to meet the more visual demands of cinematic storytelling. Forman certainly didn't skimp when it came to the visuals in "Amadeus," resurrecting the original opera house where "Don Giovanni" premiered, and rewriting a scene to make better use of the Archbishop's Palace locations. Mozart's operas are lavishly staged, and used in the film to mirror various aspects of Mozart's life and career. The climax of "Don Giovanni" providing the inspiration for Salieri's scheme is especially chilling. And then of course there is Mozart's music, heard constantly throughout the film, supervised and conducted by Neville Marriner. The famous Requiem Mass deathbed composition scene was created specifically for "Amadeus," a spectacular confluence of music, visuals, and the acting performances of Abraham and Hulce.

I grew up listening to classical music all of my life, but the experience of watching "Amadeus" was one of the few times that I felt I really had proper context for any of it. Though the particulars of the story and the relationship of Mozart and Salieri are almost totally invented, the humanization of Mozart gave me so much more appreciation for his work. And similarly the more I learn about Miloš Forman and what he undertook to bring "Amadeus" to the screen, the more I marvel at its successes.

What I've Seen - Milos Forman

Black Peter (1964)
Loves of a Blonde (1965)
The Firemen's Ball (1967)
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975)
Hair (1979)
Amadeus (1984)
The People vs. Larry Flynt (1996)
Man on the Moon (1999)
Goya's Ghosts (2006)



---